Dilip C. Parekh

2 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

Appeal No.523 of 2022 dismissed, upholding AO penalty of Rs.5 lakh under Section 15HA

SAT-appeal

Challenge to freezing of the appellant's joint demat account based solely on her husband's regulatory restraint and alleged inability to establish sole ownership of the securities.
Impugned communication dated 1 December 2021 quashed · SEBI directed to defreeze the appellant's demat account forthwith
Appeal: Appeal No. 784 of 2021 allowed by SAT on 6 July 2022.
Published false, inflated and misleading financial results for FY 2008-09 and 2009-10 and failed to disclose sales to Raydox Technologies FZ LLC as Related Party Transactions in FY 2009-10 annual report.
Appeal No.522 of 2022 dismissed, upholding WTM 3-year restraint from accessing and dealing in securities market · Appeal No.523 of 2022 dismissed, upholding AO penalty of Rs.5 lakh under Section 15HA
Appeal: Appeal Nos.522 and 523 of 2022 heard together, reserved 12 July 2024 and dismissed 4 October 2024

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Dilip C. Parekh. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.