Dhaval Satishkumar Agrawal

SAT-appeal

• Alleged fraudulent and unfair trade practices in violation of Section 12A of the SEBI Act read with Regulations 3 and 4 of the PFUTP Regulations.
  Impugned AO order dated 16 November 2018 quashed. · Matters remitted to the AO for fresh decision after giving appellants opportunity to file replies and contest.
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 36, 37, 38, 39 and 52 of 2022 allowed on 29 August 2022; impugned order quashed and matters remitted.
• Alleged violation of Section 12A(a),(b),(c) read with Regulations 3 and 4 of PFUTP Regulations, 2003 for fraudulent and unfair trade practices.
  Impugned AO ex-parte order quashed and Appeals No. 36,37,38,39,52 of 2022 allowed · Matters remitted to AO to decide afresh after giving opportunity to file replies and contest
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 36,37,38,39,52 of 2022 allowed on 29.08.2022; prior Appeal No.123 of 2019 allowed on 07.11.2019 with remand for fresh SCN
• Alleged violation of Section 12A of the SEBI Act read with Regulations 3 and 4 of the PFUTP Regulations.
  Impugned AO order was quashed and set aside. · Matters remitted to the AO for fresh decision after giving appellants opportunity to reply and contest.
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 36, 37, 38, 39 and 52 of 2022 allowed on 29 August 2022; impugned order quashed and matters remitted.
• Alleged fraudulent and unfair trade practices violating Section 12A SEBI Act read with Regulations 3-4 PFUTP Regulations; specific scrip/trades not detailed in SAT order
  Impugned AO ex-parte order quashed · Appeal Nos. 36, 37, 38, 39 and 52 of 2022 allowed
• Alleged violation of Section 12A SEBI Act read with Regulations 3 and 4 PFUTP Regulations for fraudulent and unfair trade practices.
  Impugned AO ex-parte order quashed, appeals allowed · Matters remitted to AO to decide afresh after allowing replies and contest
  Appeal: Appeal Nos. 36, 37, 38, 39, 52 of 2022 allowed on 29.08.2022; impugned AO order quashed and remanded