Deepakkumar Shantilal Jain
Penalties and directions recorded
- Penalty of Rs. 5 lakh imposed by the AO upheld.
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-1A179719DEC3820F0FC57C88Appeal No. 92 of 2008 disposed of in terms of the same order as Appeal No. 104 of 2007 dated 7 July 2008 · No order as to costsAppeal: Appeal No. 92 of 2008 disposed of on 30 July 2008; decided in terms of the order in Appeal No. 104 of 2007 dated 7 July 2008
- SAT matter SATV-E076642B8464476EAEEF37AESame order as in Appeal No. 20 of 2009 decided on 30.12.2009Appeal: Appeal No. 17 of 2009 decided on 30.12.2009
- Failure to comply with the WTM's disgorgement direction and the Supreme Court's direction to comply with that order.Appeal No. 490 of 2018 dismissed. · Penalty of Rs. 5 lakh imposed by the AO upheld.Appeal: Appeal No. 490 of 2018 dismissed by SAT on 24 September 2019.
- SAT matter SATV-C19CFCD0944C43B534D4E8CFSame order as in Appeal No. 20 of 2009 decided on 30.12.2009 - appeal disposed accordinglyAppeal: Appeal No. 19 of 2009 decided on 30.12.2009 - disposed by same order as Appeal No. 20 of 2009
Source: SecMarx — Deepakkumar Shantilal Jain. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.