D.V. Sekhar

6 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

The Tribunal declined to interfere with its earlier orders
Recovery Officer order dated 20 April 2015 directed pay Rs 30 lakh within four weeks failing arrest in execution

SAT-appeal

SAT matter SATV-15D79DC9DF01B9A3017AD629
Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 638 to 641 of 2019 were rejected as patently misconceived and a misuse of the court process.
Appeal: Appeals against the Recovery Officer's order were dismissed by SAT on 16 April 2019; review applications were dismissed on 17 July 2019; the applicants' Civil Appeal before the Supreme Court was dismissed on 21 October 2019.
Non-payment of SEBI penalties and alleged dishonest transfer or concealment of property to obstruct recovery, supporting arrest and detention proceedings.
Appeals challenged the Recovery Officer's order dated 20 April 2015 and attachment order dated 2 December 2015. · The extracted text does not include the final operative disposal directions.
Appeal: SAT Appeal No.284 of 2015, along with Appeals Nos.23, 24, 25 and 382 of 2016; reserved 8 April 2019 and decision dated 16 April 2019. Final disposal is not included in the extracted text.
SAT matter SATV-49407BD3DC81C2A01214335C
Misc. Applications rejected as patently misconceived and not allowable · Applications held to be misuse of process of the Court/Tribunal
Appeal: Appeals against Recovery Officer dismissed 16.04.2019 in Appeal No.284/2015 and companions; Review dismissed 17.07.2019; Civil Appeal dismissed by Supreme Court 21.10.2019
SAT matter SATV-40B7D6792B2DA3876CFC3D59
Review Applications Nos. 10, 11, 12 and 13 of 2019 were rejected · The Tribunal declined to interfere with its earlier orders
Appeal: Review Applications Nos. 10, 11, 12 and 13 of 2019, arising in Appeals Nos. 382, 23, 24 and 25 of 2016, rejected on 17 July 2019
Violation of PFUTP and PIT Regulations leading to penalties; subsequent charge of dishonestly transferring property and refusing to pay despite means to obstruct recovery under Section 28A.
Failure to pay 2010 PFUTP/PIT penalties and alleged dishonest transfer of properties to obstruct recovery certificates despite having means to pay.
Recovery Officer order dated 20 April 2015 directed pay Rs 30 lakh within four weeks failing arrest in execution · Recovery Officer attachment order dated 2 December 2015 attached Flat A1101 Dev Paradise for Vinod Hingorani dues

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — D.V. Sekhar. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.