Brooks Laboratories Ltd.
Penalties and directions recorded
- Each appellant to pay Rs. 25,000 costs to SEBI
- Time for SEBI to pass the orders was extended by six months from 28 October 2016.
- Time for SEBI to pass the underlying orders was extended by six months from 28 October 2016.
- AO imposed individual penalties aggregating Rs 11.80 crore under Section 15HA/15HB - under challenge; SAT operative directions not in excerpt
- Time to pass order pursuant to SAT order dated 15 December 2015 extended by six months from 28.10.2016
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-09B764D466C6D38025EEB268Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 47 and 48 of 2016 allowed and delays of 109 days condoned · Appeal Nos. 38, 39, 69 and 70 of 2016 disposed of as infructuousAppeal: Appeal Nos. 38, 39, 69 and 70 of 2016 disposed of as infructuous on 1 March 2017; Appeals Nos. 246, 322, 323 and 324 of 2015 remained pending for final arguments
- SAT matter SATV-1E48B7D9673ACCE967A40CB2Appeals and connected miscellaneous applications withdrawn and disposed of · Each appellant permitted to file fresh appeals and applications with additional grounds and documentsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 disposed of on 5 March 2018 after withdrawal with liberty to file fresh appeals; connected Misc. Applications Nos. 14 to 33 of 2018 also disposed of
- SAT matter SATV-244D1E27FCD590CC52C8A96ATime to pass the order was extended by six months from 28 October 2016. · Miscellaneous applications were disposed of with no order as to costs.Appeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 261-275 of 2016 in Appeals Nos. 26-40 of 2015 disposed of on 28 October 2016
- SAT matter SATV-24003D1051F4BD3960B50BCATime for SEBI to pass the orders was extended by six months from 28 October 2016. · Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 261 to 275 of 2016 were disposed of with no order as to costs.Appeal: Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 261 to 275 of 2016 in Appeals Nos. 26 to 40 of 2015 disposed of on 28 October 2016.
- SAT matter SATV-2A9236C94671C13C0404EE89Time for SEBI to pass the underlying orders was extended by six months from 28 October 2016. · All Miscellaneous Applications were disposed of with no order as to costs.Appeal: Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 261-275 of 2016 in Appeals Nos. 26-40 of 2015 disposed of on 28 October 2016; extension granted.
- SAT matter SATV-2143A959FE26DC313157C814Time to pass order extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · All Misc. Applications disposed accordingly with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos.261-275 of 2016 in Appeals Nos.26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016; extension to comply with Tribunal order dated 15.12.2015
- SAT matter SATV-27170ED35387DE5AB0BFD03CTime to comply with Tribunal order dated 15.12.2015 extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · All Misc. Applications Nos. 261 to 275 of 2016 disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Application Nos. 261-275 of 2016 in Appeal Nos. 26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016; extension granted
- SAT matter SATV-2FBC4D5BDAD07720A2E76168Time to pass order extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · All Misc. Applications disposed of with no order as to costs
- Alleged round-tripping/siphoning of Rs 8 cr IPO proceeds via ICD repayments, Rs 2.5 cr diversion via Overall for trading, and non-disclosure/false statements in RHP/Prospectus on Suryamukhi/Neo Power advances and ICDs.AO imposed individual penalties aggregating Rs 11.80 crore under Section 15HA/15HB - under challenge; SAT operative directions not in excerptAppeal: Appeal Nos. 246, 322, 323, 324 of 2015 against AO order 12.01.2015; SAT reserved 06.03.2018, decided 21.03.2018; separate appeal against WTM order 10.09.2015 became infructuous after 5-year debar suffered
- SAT matter SATV-9930A3EE1BDC1E07ACD3AE44Time to pass order extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · All Misc. Applications No.261-275 of 2016 disposed accordingly with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications No.261-275 of 2016 in Appeals No.26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016 with extension granted
- SAT matter SATV-8DABCEF1CA7C13986D54C474Time to pass order extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · Misc. Applications Nos. 261-275 of 2016 disposed with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 261-275 of 2016 in Appeals Nos. 26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016 with extension granted
- SAT matter SATV-98CA0C19A6D19B4458720BB3Time to pass order pursuant to SAT order dated 15 December 2015 extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · Misc. Applications No.261-275 of 2016 disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications No.261-275 of 2016 in Appeal No.26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016 with extension granted
- Securities market violation leading to 5-year debarment from accessing market; specific charge details not stated in this order.Delay of 109 days in Appeal Nos. 69 and 70 of 2016 condoned; Misc. Applications 47-48 of 2016 disposed · Appeal Nos. 38, 39, 69 and 70 of 2016 disposed as infructuous with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 38,39,69,70 of 2016 disposed as infructuous on 1.3.2017; Appeal Nos. 246,322,323,324 of 2015 pending for final arguments
- SAT matter SATV-AD533E4A78A27877FD6E1F12Time to pass order per Tribunal order dated 15.12.2015 extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · All Misc. Applications Nos.261-275 of 2016 disposed with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos.261-275 of 2016 in Appeals Nos.26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016 granting extension; relates to Tribunal directions dated 15.12.2015
- SAT matter SATV-B6A1D6F825CB2132F165A7D4Time to pass order extended by six months from 28.10.2016 to comply with Tribunal directions dated 15.12.2015 · All Misc. Applications Nos.261-275 of 2016 disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos.261-275 of 2016 in Appeals Nos.26-40 of 2015; seeks extension of time to comply with SAT order dated 15.12.2015; extension granted on 28.10.2016, main appeals pending
- Alleged round-tripping and siphoning of Rs 8 cr IPO proceeds via ICD repayments and Rs 2.5 cr diversion for trading, plus non-disclosure and false statements in DRHP/RHP on ICDs and Suryamukhi/Neo Power contracts and advances.Operative SAT findings not in excerpt; impugned AO order dated 12.01.2015 imposed aggregate penalty Rs 11.80 crAppeal: Appeal Nos. 246, 322, 323, 324 of 2015 against AO order 12.01.2015; reserved 06.03.2018, decided 21.03.2018; appeal against WTM order 10.09.2015 became infructuous
- SAT matter SATV-637698CCADC94C8510468F47Time for SEBI to pass the order was extended by six months from 28 October 2016. · All Miscellaneous Applications were disposed of with no order as to costs.Appeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 261 to 275 of 2016 in Appeal Nos. 26 to 40 of 2015 disposed of on 28 October 2016
- SAT matter SATV-5F96B707DC63018381CCE673Time for SEBI to pass the orders was extended by six months from 28 October 2016. · Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 261 to 275 of 2016 were disposed of with no order as to costs.Appeal: Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 261 to 275 of 2016 in Appeals Nos. 26 to 40 of 2015 disposed of on 28 October 2016; no order as to costs.
- SAT matter SATV-6F2E5C052BFB550613D63B97Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 47 and 48 of 2016 allowed; 109-day delay in filing Appeals 69 and 70 condoned · Appeals 38, 39, 69 and 70 of 2016 disposed of as infructuous without entering into meritsAppeal: Appeals 38, 39, 69 and 70 of 2016 disposed of as infructuous on 1 March 2017; Appeals 246, 322, 323 and 324 of 2015 remained pending for final arguments
- Alleged siphoning of Rs 8 cr from IPO proceeds via round-tripping through ICD repayments and misutilisation of Rs 2.5 cr via Overall for trading, plus non-disclosure and false statements in RHP/Prospectus on ICDs, Suryamukhi and Neo Power contracts and costs.AO impugned order dated 12.01.2015 imposed individual penalties aggregating to Rs 11.80 crore under Section 15HA/15HB for PFUTP and ICDR violations (under challenge in SAT appeals)Appeal: SAT Appeals No. 246, 322, 323 and 324 of 2015 against AO common order dated 12.01.2015; reserved 06.03.2018, date of decision 21.03.2018; separate appeal against WTM order dated 10.09.2015 became infructuous after undergoing 5-year debarment
- SAT matter SATV-6E844E3ECCEF7C1FEB8E4E48Delay of 109 days condoned; Misc. Applications No.47 and 48 of 2016 disposed of · Appeal Nos.38,39,69 and 70 of 2016 disposed as infructuous with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos.38,39,69,70 of 2016 disposed as infructuous on 1.3.2017; Appeal Nos.246,322,323,324 of 2015 pending for final arguments
- Alleged siphoning of IPO proceeds via Rs 8 cr round-tripping through Suryamukhi-linked ICD repayments and Rs 2.5 cr diversion via Overall for trading, plus non-disclosure of ICDs and advances and false statements in RHP/Prospectus.Appeal: Appeals No. 246, 322, 323, 324 of 2015 reserved 06.03.2018 for decision 21.03.2018; separate appeal against WTM order 10.09.2015 became infructuous after 5-year debarment suffered
- SAT matter SATV-AD60B8379E488AEEEB21EEABTime to pass final order as contemplated by common order dated 28 October 2016 extended by three months from today · All Misc. Applications disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 159-173 of 2017 in Appeals Nos. 26-40 of 2015 disposed on 18.05.2017 with extension granted
- SAT matter SATV-DB47D53FB676B9EFE75C5B99Time to comply with Tribunal order dated 15 December 2015 extended by six months from 28 October 2016 · All Misc. Applications Nos. 261-275 of 2016 disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications Nos. 261-275 of 2016 in Appeals Nos. 26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016 with extension granted on consent
- SAT matter SATV-E5BF8EFA3BE0F9D8568ACFFATime to pass order in terms of Tribunal order dated 15 December 2015 extended by six months from 28.10.2016 · Misc. Applications No.261 to 275 of 2016 disposed with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Applications No.261-275 of 2016 in Appeal Nos.26-40 of 2015 disposed on 28.10.2016 with extension granted
- SAT matter SATV-E15D5F17A5D2C53B3B4A9B2BCondoned 109-day delay in Appeal Nos.69 and 70 of 2016; disposed Misc. Applications 47-48 of 2016 · Disposed Appeal Nos.38, 39, 69 and 70 of 2016 as infructuous with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos.38, 39, 69, 70 of 2016 disposed as infructuous on 1.3.2017; Appeal Nos.246, 322, 323, 324 of 2015 pending for final arguments
Source: SecMarx — Brooks Laboratories Ltd.. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.