Basant Periwal & Co.

3 matters before the Securities Appellate Tribunal

Penalties and directions recorded

Recovery Officer imposed litigation cost of Rs. 10,000, subject to adjustment against any fresh Recovery Certificate
Cost of Rs. 10,000 imposed on Recovery Officer towards litigation cost, adjustable against fresh recovery certificate for other amounts
Appeal Nos. 158 and 194 of 2009 dismissed, AO penalty upheld

SAT-appeal

SAT matter SATV-32C0C0B8A7AEFA8EA7D089CA
Appeals Nos. 858 and 859 of 2022 dismissed as infructuous · Miscellaneous applications disposed of
Appeal: Appeal Nos. 858 and 859 of 2022 dismissed as infructuous on 16 November 2022; Misc. Applications Nos. 1234 and 1245 of 2022 disposed of
SAT matter SATV-F1C77D54C47153F9FE3E4D26
Appeal Nos. 858 and 859 of 2022 dismissed as infructuous · Misc. Application Nos. 1234 and 1245 of 2022 disposed of accordingly
Appeal: Appeal Nos. 858 and 859 of 2022 with Misc. Applications 1234 and 1245 of 2022 dismissed as infructuous on 16.11.2022
Executed manipulative fictitious reverse trades in scrip of Minolta Finance Ltd on behalf of clients without transfer of beneficial ownership.
Appeal Nos. 158 and 194 of 2009 dismissed, AO penalty upheld · No costs
Appeal: Appeal Nos. 158 and 194 of 2009 disposed and dismissed on 30.3.2010

Analyse these matters in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — Basant Periwal & Co.. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.