Arun Porecha
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-7F4D993B15F3C27365A4AB60Order follows the same order as Appeal No. 164 of 2009 decided on 5 August 2010Appeal: Appeal No. 165 of 2009 decided on 5 August 2010
- Alleged execution of structured/cross/matched deals for UTI with sellers to offload shares, distorting scrip equilibrium and creating artificial volumes in Mobile Telecommunications Ltd.Appeals No. 164 and 165 of 2009 allowed · SEBI WTM order dated 09.09.2009 suspending registration set asideAppeal: Appeal No. 164 and 165 of 2009 decided on 05.08.2010 - allowed, impugned SEBI order set aside
Source: SecMarx — Arun Porecha. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.