Amul Sumatichandra Mehta
Penalties and directions recorded
- Matter restored to Adjudicating Officer for fresh order on merits and in accordance with law after personal hearing
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-42D8C1FA0A9255AC9DE60C4DTime for passing final order extended by two months · Misc. Application disposed of with no order as to costsAppeal: Misc. Application No. 51 of 2015 in Appeal No. 77 of 2014 disposed on 29.01.2015; main appeal pending for final order
- Violation attracting penalty under Section 15A(b) of SEBI Act, 1992 (specific reporting failure not detailed in SAT order)Impugned AO order dated 29.01.2014 quashed and set aside without recording reasons · Matter restored to Adjudicating Officer for fresh order on merits and in accordance with law after personal hearingAppeal: Appeal No. 77 of 2014 decided on 01.10.2014; disposed with remand to AO for fresh order
- Alleged failure by promoters/promoter groups to make yearly shareholding disclosures under Reg 8(2) SAST 1997 / Reg 30(2) SAST 2011.Appeal: Appeal Nos. 281,280,212-223,385 of 2014 and 80,325 of 2015 before SAT; reserved 20.10.2015, decided 20.11.2015 by common order.
Source: SecMarx — Amul Sumatichandra Mehta. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.