Adjudicating Officer, Securities and Exchange Board of India
Penalties and directions recorded
- For orders, see Appeal No. 216 of 2011
- For orders, see Appeal No. 63 of 2012 decided on 03 October 2012.
- Order disposed of by reference to the orders in Appeal No. 216 of 2011
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-0527D0613B8DB1BB70653974Appeal disposed of by adopting the same order as in Appeal No. 153 of 2009 decided on 5 January 2010Appeal: Appeal No. 157 of 2009 decided on 5 January 2010; order states it is the same as Appeal No. 153 of 2009 decided on that date
- SAT matter SATV-0D3C635420473C6D957420EBAppeal disposed of by adopting the same order as in Appeal No. 54 of 2009 decided on 23 September 2009Appeal: Appeal No. 68 of 2009 decided on 23 September 2009; order states it is the same as the order in Appeal No. 54 of 2009 decided the same day
- SAT matter SATV-153501D36131110F1D3AF1B8Application for condonation of 605-day delay dismissed · Appeal dismissedAppeal: Appeal No. 520 of 2024 dismissed on 4 April 2025; delay of 605 days not condoned
- SAT matter SATV-15BF5C3882D48B7993CC3F95For orders, see Appeal No. 216 of 2011Appeal: Appeal No. 78 of 2012 decided on 09 November 2012; order refers to Appeal No. 216 of 2011 for the reasons/orders.
- SAT matter SATV-178F8AAE6FEC081111C5C720Appeal disposed of by adopting the same order as in Appeal No. 153 of 2009 decided on 5 January 2010Appeal: Appeal No. 154 of 2009 decided on 5 January 2010; order states it is the same as Appeal No. 153 of 2009 decided on that date
- SAT matter SATV-1B890DAF0F3C9673534A3788Appeal dismissed for want of prosecutionAppeal: Miscellaneous Application No. 110 of 2019 in Appeal (L) No. 294 of 2018 dismissed for want of prosecution on 05 April 2019
- Alleged negligence and lack of due diligence by allowing clients to take large positions disproportionate to their declared income, resulting in artificial volumes and price manipulation.Appeal allowed · Impugned adjudicating officer's order set asideAppeal: Appeal No. 176 of 2011, decided on 25 November 2011; appeal allowed and impugned order set aside.
- SAT matter SATV-20C4753DE0D9012DA56F2112Appeal disposed of by following the same order as in Appeal No. 188 of 2009 decided on 24 February 2010Appeal: Appeal No. 216 of 2009 decided on 24 February 2010; disposed of by the same order as Appeal No. 188 of 2009
- SAT matter SATV-2C4AC66F7EAB5906166AD960Order states it is the same order as in Appeal No. 122 of 2012 decided on 8 November 2012Appeal: Appeal No. 129 of 2012 decided on 8 November 2012; order follows the same order as Appeal No. 122 of 2012
- SAT matter SATV-2C62A7A417975C33C861A161Appeal disposed of by adopting the same order as in Appeal No. 110 of 2009 decided on 23 March 2010Appeal: Appeal No. 111 of 2009 decided on 23 March 2010; same order as Appeal No. 110 of 2009
- SAT matter SATV-3000EEB2E5463E7C2986E6EBAppeal No. 62 of 2009 was disposed of by adopting the same order as in Appeal No. 74 of 2009 decided on 15 September 2009.Appeal: Appeal No. 62 of 2009 decided on 15 September 2009; disposed of by following the same order as Appeal No. 74 of 2009.
- SAT matter SATV-3716F590C3D379508741EA25Appeal disposed of by directing that the matter be governed by the same order as Appeal No. 74 of 2009 decided on 15 September 2009Appeal: Appeal No. 60 of 2009 decided on 15 September 2009; order states it is the same as the order in Appeal No. 74 of 2009 decided on that date
- SAT matter SATV-5435901384EF5B65F6506424Appeal disposed of by adopting the same order as in Appeal No. 122 of 2012Appeal: Appeal No. 128 of 2012 decided on 8 November 2012; order states it is the same as the order in Appeal No. 122 of 2012
- SAT matter SATV-5BFDE3A73F20831FF0F0404AAppeal disposed of by adopting the same order as in Appeal No. 188 of 2009 decided on 24 February 2010Appeal: Appeal No. 245 of 2009 decided on 24 February 2010; disposed of by same order as Appeal No. 188 of 2009 decided on that date
- SAT matter SATV-602CD66DE42A79440DF0C0B6For orders, see Appeal No. 63 of 2012 decided on 03 October 2012.Appeal: Appeal No. 61 of 2012 decided on 03 October 2012; order records that orders were issued with reference to Appeal No. 63 of 2012 decided the same day.
- SAT matter SATV-79651900EA316FF90E5C7B28Order disposed of by reference to the orders in Appeal No. 216 of 2011Appeal: Appeal No. 74 of 2012 decided on 09 November 2012; order states: "For orders see Appeal no. 216 of 2011."
Source: SecMarx — Adjudicating Officer, Securities and Exchange Board of India. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.