sebi:WTM/TCN/134/IVD1/JAN/09
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Direction issued to the sub-broker to be careful in future and exercise due care and diligence; no monetary penalty imposed; enhancement of penalty rejected.
Provisions invoked
- s. 19
Regulations
- Reg. 4
- Reg. 13(2)
- Reg. 15
- Reg. 8
- Reg. 199
- Reg. 28(2)
- Reg. 13(5)
Parties
- M/s M.S. Consultancy Services (Sub Broker of Apex Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd.)
Holding
The sub-broker was directed to exercise due care and diligence in future as a capital market intermediary, without imposition of any monetary penalty. The Enquiry Officer's recommendation of a minor penalty of warning was accepted and the show cause notice seeking enhancement of penalty was rejected for want of legally sustainable grounds.
Full text
2 individuals who were prima facie related/connected to each other traded significantly for approximately 75% of the total trades in the scrip on BSE through 14 member broker/sub brokers.
3 Regulations. The enquiry officer submitted his report dated February 11, 2005 recommending a minor penalty of warning to the sub broker.
4 6. An opportunity of personal hearing was granted to the sub broker on September 5, 2006 before me wherein the persons stated on the first page of order appeared and made submissions.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/TCN/134/IVD1/JAN/09. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.