sebi:WTM/SR/IMD/200/12/2015

SEBI · SEBI · S. Raman, Whole Time Member

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Application for reconsideration rejected; SEBI Order dated February 27, 2015 (rejecting renewal of certificate of registration as portfolio manager) upheld; certificate to stand cancelled after thirty days

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

SEBI rejected Sahara AMC's application for reconsideration of the February 27, 2015 Order, holding that Sahara AMC is not a 'fit and proper person' under the Portfolio Managers Regulations read with the Intermediaries Regulations because Shri Subrata Roy Sahara exercises substantial controlling interest and significant influence over Sahara AMC through the Promoter Companies.

Full text

Page 2 of 15 6. Before proceeding further, it is pertinent to refer to the relevant provisions of the Portfolio Managers Regulations and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008 ("Intermediaries Regulations"), which read as under:

Page 3 of 15 10. Procedure where registration is not granted. 1. Where an application for grant of a certificate under regulation 3 or of renewal under regulation 9 does not satisfy the requirements set out in regulation 6, the Board may reject the application, after giving an opportunity of being heard.

Page 4 of 15 8. Thereafter, vide an Order dated February 27, 2015, SEBI disposed of Sahara AMC’s application dated July 6, 2012, with the following directions –

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/SR/IMD/200/12/2015. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.