sebi:WTM/RKA/ISD/144/2016
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Interim directions dated June 01, 2016 confirmed against the Noticees; directions to remain in force till further directions.
Provisions invoked
- s. 19
Holding
The Whole Time Member confirmed the ad interim ex-parte order dated June 01, 2016 against the Noticees, including directions to withhold sale proceeds of trades of July 27, 2015, which shall remain in force till further directions.
Full text
Confirmatory Order in the matter of Dhyana Finstock Limited Page 2 of 5 desire, may avail themselves of an opportunity of personal hearing before SEBI, on a date and time to be fixed on a specific request, received from them. I note that though a copy of the
Confirmatory Order in the matter of Dhyana Finstock Limited Page 3 of 5 6. The facts and circumstances discussed in the interim order further indicate a scheme, device and artifice to dump shares on July 27, 2015 in a pre-planned manner i.e. by employing a scheme of sending fake SMS inducing investors to buy in the scrip. This event completed the chain of events which started with the preferential allotment in Dhyana followed by listing at BSE and alleged price manipulation by Dhyana Group. Thus, apart from misusing stock exchange mechanism for bogus LTCG, investors were also lured to buy shares of Dhyana at an unjustified price with the bait of stupendous profits and the shares were dumped on these investors. Considering that the pay-out for trades of July 27, 2015 amounting to ₹ 13,38,27,975/- was withheld by BSE, while the whole scheme involving these transactions is under examination/investigation, SEBI vide the said interim order, as a protective measure and in order to prevent the use of such sale proceeds in any manner by the sellers in such trades, directed that the said sale proceeds should continue to be withheld by BSE till further orders.
Confirmatory Order in the matter of Dhyana Finstock Limited Page 4 of 5 acted in connivance for implementation of dubious plan, device and artifice that has led to the misuse of stock exchange mechanism to artificially increase price and volume of the scrip to provide illegitimate gains to the preferential allottees in order to claim LTCG benefits that has not only eroded the market integrity but has also been detrimental to the interests of investors who might have been lured to invest in the scrip due to such manipulative and fraudulent trading in the scrip and price movement. In absence of any material to establish the contrary, I do not find any reason to revoke or modify the directions of the interim order dated June 01, 2016 in the matter of Dhyana Finstock Limited against the Noticees.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/RKA/ISD/144/2016. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.