sebi:WTM/RKA/EFD/DRA-III/82/2016

SEBI · SEBI · 2011-09-30 · Rajeev Kumar Agarwal, Whole Time Member

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Noticees found to have violated due diligence requirements; directions issued under section 11(1), (4) and 11B of the SEBI Act, 1992

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The Noticees (ACML and its officers) failed to exercise the due diligence expected from a SEBI-registered Merchant Banker under the ICDR Regulations, thereby violating regulation 64(1) of the ICDR Regulations read with regulations 8(2)(b), (e), (f), 57(1), (2)(a), (b) thereof and regulation 13 of the Merchant Banker Regulations.

Full text

__________________________________________________________________________ Order in respect of Atherstone Capital Markets Ltd. Page 2 of 27

__________________________________________________________________________ Order in respect of Atherstone Capital Markets Ltd. Page 3 of 27

__________________________________________________________________________ Order in respect of Atherstone Capital Markets Ltd. Page 4 of 27

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/RKA/EFD/DRA-III/82/2016. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.