sebi:WTM/PS/87/CIS/MAR/2014

SEBI · SEBI · 2013-08-27 · Prashant Saran, Whole Time Member

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Show cause notice disposed of without any direction or penalty

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The Whole Time Member disposed of the show cause notice issued to Marwahs Fine Art Dealers without imposing any penalty or direction, finding no evidence that Marwah had mobilized funds under an 'art fund' scheme or acted in contravention of section 12(1B) of the SEBI Act and regulation 3 of the CIS Regulations.

Full text

Page 2 of 3 the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as 'SEBI Act') should not be issued against it for the alleged violations of the provisions of section 12 read with sections 11 and 11AA of the SEBI Act and the CIS Regulations.

Page 3 of 3 6. I also note that SEBI has not received any complaint against Marwah till date regarding any scheme of 'art fund'. Considering the above, I do not consider this a fit case to impose any

3. Marwah vide its undated letter (received by SEBI on July 12, 2007) replied to the SCN. Before proceeding further, an opportunity of personal hearing was granted to Marwah on August 19, 2013. On the date fixed Mr. Atul Marwah appeared for Marwah and made

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/PS/87/CIS/MAR/2014. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.