sebi:WTM/PS/50/ISD/JUN/2016

SEBI · SEBI · 2015-07-30 · Prashant Saran, Whole Time Member

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Directed SEBI to investigate the allegations pertaining to Takeover Regulations against the five noticees and examine their submissions/material expeditiously; directed noticees to cooperate; no final finding on regulation 3(2) violation made at this stage.

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

No final liability under regulation 3(2) is decided; SEBI is directed to investigate the alleged Takeover Regulation violations against the five noticees and examine their submissions/material, and the noticees are directed to cooperate.

Full text

Page 2 of 21 Regulations, 1992 (PIT Regulations), regulations 3(2), 31(1), 31(2) and 31(3) of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 (Takeover Regulations, 2011), section 77(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 and clauses 35, 41, 32 and 49 Listing Agreement. The

Page 3 of 21 with the other persons to acquire shares of ZSL beyond prescribed threshold, any association however close cannot be a determining factor for alleging that the two persons are acting in concert.

Page 4 of 21 (b) trusts of which such person or his immediate relative is a trustee; (c) partnership firm in which such person or his immediate relative is a partner; and (d) members of Hindu undivided families of which such person is a coparcener;"

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/PS/50/ISD/JUN/2016. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.