sebi:WTM/PS/39/IVD/ID-1/SEPT/2010

SEBI · SEBI · 2006-02-21 · Prashant Saran, Whole Time Member

Reviewed by Varun Matlani, Advocate — Securities Lawyer practicing in SAT and SEBI

Facts / Headnote

Enquiry proceedings disposed of without imposing any penalty or direction

Provisions invoked

Regulations relied on

Parties

Holding

The enquiry proceedings against Milan Mahindra Securities Pvt. Ltd. were disposed of without imposing any penalty or direction, as the record did not contain sufficient evidence to establish violations of Regulation 4(b) of the PFUTP Regulations or Clauses A(3) and (4) of the Code of Conduct under the Brokers Regulations.

Full text

Page 2 of 4 Brokers) Regulations, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Broker Regulations’). The Enquiry Officer submitted his Report dated February 21, 2006, in terms of Regulation 13 (1) of the Enquiry Regulations recommending a penalty of suspension of certificate of registration for a period of three months for violating the provisions of Regulation 4(b) of PFUTP Regulations and Clause A (3) and (4) of Code of Conduct as specified in Schedule II of Regulation 7 of Broker Regulations.

Page 3 of 4 parte, on the basis of material available on record, having complied with the principles of natural justice.

Page 4 of 4 consider this a fit case to impose the penalty of suspension as recommended by the Enquiry Officer. In the interest of justice and equity, the enquiry proceedings initiated against the noticee is disposed of as ordered herein below.

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/PS/39/IVD/ID-1/SEPT/2010. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.