sebi:WTM/PS/21/IVD/ID-03/AUG/2011

SEBI · SEBI · 2003-11-07 · Prashant Saran, Whole Time Member

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Enquiry proceedings disposed of without imposing any penalty or direction

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The charge against the noticee of creating artificial market in the scrip of Cyberspace so as to enable entities/family related to the proprietor to off-load shares allotted in the private placement prior to IPO cannot sustain, and the enquiry proceedings are disposed of without imposing any penalty or direction.

Full text

Page 2 of 5 have placed large buy-orders majority of which were deleted after a few orders got executed. By adopting this methodology, the entities had tried to create buying depth in the scrip which attracted other investors in the scrip.

Page 3 of 5 the penalty as recommended by the Enquiry Officer since the same is not commensurate with the alleged violations committed by it and desires to impose a higher penalty. The noticee was asked to show cause as to why the

Page 4 of 5 provided to it is incomplete. It is seen that all the details that have been relied upon are provided to the noticee. However, I note that no document, which has not been provided to the noticee, is being relied upon in the present proceedings. Having considered all these, the issues that arise for my consideration is: Whether the noticee has indulged in acts which were in violation of Regulation 4 of PFUTP Regulations and Regulation 7 read with Clause A (1),(2),(3) and (4) of the Code of Conduct specified under Schedule II of the Broker Regulations?

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/PS/21/IVD/ID-03/AUG/2011. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.