sebi:WTM/MSS/ID2/85/2010
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Directions issued against Mr. P. S. Saminathan (10-year market ban, public offer and delisting direction) and Ms. Uma Saminathan (5-year market ban); no direction issued against PSTL due to pending winding up.
Provisions invoked
- s. 19
- s. 12A
- s. 11C
- s. 446
- s. 171
- s. 446(1)
- s. 10
Regulations
- Reg. 11
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 3(b)
- Reg. 107
- Reg. 23
Parties
- Mr. P. S. Saminathan
- Ms. Uma Saminathan
- Pyramid Saimira Technologies Ltd (PSTL)
Holding
The noticees were found to have violated Section 12A of the SEBI Act and the PFUTP Regulations through fictitious accounting entries, false disclosures, and illegal allotment of warrants without consideration. Mr. P. S. Saminathan was restrained from the securities market for ten years and directed to make a public offer and delist PSTL, while Ms. Uma Saminathan was restrained for five years.
Full text
Page 2 of 9 Requirements) Regulations, 2009 (‘ICDR Regulations’). The SCN called upon the noticees to show cause as to why appropriate directions under Sections 11, 11B and 11(4) of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with regulation 11 of the PFUTP Regulations, 2003 and regulation 107 of the ICDR Regulations be not issued against them.
Page 3 of 9 ground to believe unless it is proved to be unreasonable by the noticees. Further, I find that under Section 11C, an investigation authority can investigate the affairs of persons associated with the securities market. The affairs would necessarily include the accounts of such person. I find from records that SEBI had initiated an investigation into buying, selling and dealing in shares of PSTL vide its order dated January 22, 2009 and while doing so, it called upon the noticees to provide certain documents relating to income / revenues of PSTL. Since the noticees did not co-operate with the investigation, SEBI ordered verification of books of accounts of PSTL on July 1, 2009. Hence I find that the investigation covers the books of accounts of PSTL. Therefore, the investigation as well as the consequential SCN is within the four corners of law. 3.2 The noticees have submitted that they cannot be charged under Section 12A which basically deals with intermediaries and they are not covered under the said section. Similarly, they have stated that they cannot be charged under PFUTP Regulations, as they have not dealt in shares of PSTL. I, however, find that Section 12A prohibits any person from employing manipulative and deceptive devices. This Section is not limited to intermediaries, as claimed by the noticees, and includes any person, including the noticees. Further, PFUTP Regulations prohibit a person from employing any manipulative or deceptive device in connectio
Page 4 of 9 officials to investigate into affairs of a company is not in good taste. I find that though the noticees have repeatedly committed to provide the records and agreements to investigation authority and sought time for the purpose, they did not provide complete records despite summons issued under the law. Their failure to provide the necessary documents to the investigation authority not only amounts to non-cooperation with investigation in breach of law, but also gives a strong indication that they are trying to hide something which, if disclosed, would go against them or there are no records, as alleged by SEBI. Similarly, they sought time to reply to the SCN, but their reply did not cover accounting related charges. They merely responded that it is their prerogative to maintain the accounting records in the manner to fit business exigencies. I, however, find that the charge alleged in the SCN is fictitious entries in the books of accounts, which is definitely not warranted by business exigencies. To a suggestion if they would produce records before me to refute the accounts related allegations, they replied in negative. The refusal to respond on merits to the accounts related
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/MSS/ID2/85/2010. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.