sebi:WTM/GM/EFD/78/2017-18

SEBI · SEBI · 2013-12-30 · G. Mahalingam, Whole Time Member

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Held the Scheme was an unregistered collective investment scheme; directed Susk India Ltd. and 9 promoters/directors jointly and severally to wind up and refund with returns within three months and submit winding up and repayment report; restrained them from securities market till refund plus 4 years and from holding director/KMP posts in listed companies for 4 years; disposed proceedings against Noticee Nos. 11, 12 and 13 vacating interim restraints.

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

Susk India Ltd.'s property allotment/money mobilisation scheme constituted a collective investment scheme under Section 11AA operated without registration in violation of Section 12(1B) and CIS Regulations, and the company with its 9 promoters/directors must wind up and refund investors, while Noticee Nos. 11-13 were exonerated.

Full text

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of Susk India Ltd.

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of Susk India Ltd.

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of Susk India Ltd.

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/GM/EFD/78/2017-18. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.