sebi:WTM/GM/EFD/74/2017-18

SEBI · SEBI · 2017-10-11 · G. Mahalingam, Whole Time Member

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

All seven noticees found to have contravened Section 12A(d) and (e) of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulations 3(i), 3(ii) and 4 of the PIT Regulations, 1992; prohibited from dealing in securities for 5 years; jointly and severally directed to disgorge ₹95,77,614 with 12% interest from May 27, 2010; PFUTP charges dropped.

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The seven noticees were held to have contravened Section 12A(d) and (e) of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulations 3(i), 3(ii) and 4 of the PIT Regulations, 1992, having traded in BoR shares on the basis of unpublished price sensitive information regarding the BoR-ICICI merger. They were barred from dealing in securities for 5 years and directed to jointly and severally disgorge ₹95,77,614 with 12% interest, while PFUTP charges were dropped.

Full text

__________________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of BoR Page 2 of 32

__________________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of BoR Page 3 of 32

__________________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of BoR Page 4 of 32

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/GM/EFD/74/2017-18. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.