sebi:WTM/GM/EFD/26/2019-20

SEBI · SEBI · 2018-11-12 · G. Mahalingam, Whole Time Member

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Held ex-parte (except Sandeep Shankar) that SPPDL's Joint Ventureship Scheme is an unregistered collective investment scheme; directed company and six Baghel-family directors jointly and severally to wind up and refund with returns within three months with WRR, with market and director bars and recovery on default; disposed proceedings qua Sandeep Shankar without joint repayment liability but imposed one-year market and director restraint.

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

SPPDL's Joint Ventureship Scheme constitutes an unregistered collective investment scheme in violation of section 12(1B) read with CIS Regulations, requiring wind-up and refund by the company and six directors; Sandeep Shankar is not jointly liable for wind-up/repayment but is restrained for one year for association with the illegal scheme.

Full text

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of SPPDL Page 2 of 8

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of SPPDL Page 3 of 8

__________________________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of SPPDL Page 4 of 8

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/GM/EFD/26/2019-20. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.