sebi:WTM/ASB/DDHS/DDHS-RAC-POD-II/25845/2023-24
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Proceedings against Noticee 1 disposed of without issuance of any directions; charge of interference in DHFL rating process held established against Noticee 2
Provisions invoked
- s. 11B
- s. 15
- s. 19
- s. 45
Regulations
- Reg. 24
- Reg. 24(3)
- Reg. 24(2)
Parties
- S.B. Mainak
- Rajesh Mokashi
Holding
The proceedings against Noticee 1 (S.B. Mainak) stand disposed of without issuance of any directions as interference was not established, while Noticee 2 (Rajesh Mokashi) was held to have interfered in the rating process for DHFL in contravention of the business-rating separation mandate.
Full text
__________________________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of CARE Ratings Ltd. 2 / 64
__________________________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of CARE Ratings Ltd. 3 / 64
__________________________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of CARE Ratings Ltd. 4 / 64
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/ASB/DDHS/DDHS-RAC-POD-II/25845/2023-24. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.