sebi:WTM/AB/EFD-1/DRA-3/23/2018-19
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Noticee nos. 1 and 2 debarred from accessing/dealing in securities market for four years for failure to comply with refund directions in final order dated November 9, 2015; Noticee no. 3 restrained from collecting money/launching/carrying out Collective Investment Schemes and debarred for four years or till SGAL schemes wound up and monies refunded with returns, whichever is later.
Provisions invoked
- s. 11A
- s. 11(4)
- s. 19
- s. 11(1)
Parties
- Noticee no. 1
- Noticee no. 2
- Noticee no. 3
Holding
Noticee nos. 1 and 2 are liable for market-access restrictions for non-compliance with the final refund order, and Noticee no. 3, a director during fund mobilization, is liable on par with other directors and restrained from CIS activity and securities market access.
Full text
In the matter of Sunshine Global Agro Ltd. Page 2 of 4 not alienate or dispose off or sell any of the assets of Sunshine Global Agro Limited except for the purpose of making refunds to its investors; to provide a full inventory of all their assets and properties and details of all their bank accounts, demat accounts and holdings of shares/ securities, if held in physical form;
In the matter of Sunshine Global Agro Ltd. Page 3 of 4 from Noticee no. 1 and 2. An opportunity of personal hearing was granted to all the Noticees on January 18, 2019, which was communicated to the Noticees vide letter dated November 15, 2018. The hearing notice was served on the Noticee no. 2 & 3 through paper publication in Patna edition of Times of India and Dainik Bhaskar on November 27, 2018 and on Noticee no. 1 through paper publication in Lucknow edition of Times of India and Dainik Jagran on December 04, 2018. Noticee no. 3 appeared for the personal hearing through his Advocate and reiterated the submissions made in the reply filed by him, whereas Noticee no. 1 and 2 failed to appear for the hearing.
In the matter of Sunshine Global Agro Ltd. Page 4 of 4 Noticee no. 3 that he was not aware of the illegal fund mobilizing activity (in the nature of CIS) that was being carried out by SGAL. Hence, I find Noticee no. 3 also liable on par with the other directors of SGAL, against whom directions have been passed in the final order.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:WTM/AB/EFD-1/DRA-3/23/2018-19. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.