sebi:VSS/AO-16/2009

SEBI · SEBI · 2006-05-02 · V.S. Sundaresan, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Penalty imposed on Noticee for violation of SAST Regulations

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The Adjudicating Officer held that Mayur Leather Products Limited violated regulation 11(1) read with regulation 14(1) of the SAST Regulations by making only one common delayed public announcement on January 24, 2006 for three acquisitions made on October 23, 1997, September 03, 1998 and January 25, 2002, and imposed a monetary penalty of Rs.50,000 under section 15H(ii) of the SEBI Act.

Full text

Page 2 of 12 1998 and January 25, 2002 and a common Public Announcement in respect of these 3 acquisitions was made by them on January 24,

Page 3 of 12 alleged violation of regulation 11(1) read with regulation 14(1) of SAST Regulations in respect of the acquisition/s made by the Acquirers on October 23, 1997, September 03, 1998 and January 25, 2002.

Page 4 of 12 is slightly more than 40%. This is to be viewed from another angle that the price prevailing in the market at that point of time was ranging between Rs.35 and Rs.37 per share. Thus, although the offer price was much higher than the then prevailing price, the shareholders had not tendered the shares, which clearly shows the faith imposed by the shareholders on the acquirers who are also the promoters of the Mayur Uniquoters Limited.

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:VSS/AO-16/2009. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.