sebi:VSS/AO-110/2009
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Penalty imposed on the Noticee for violation of PFUTP Regulations
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 4
- Reg. 4(1)
- Reg. 2
- Reg. 4(2)(a)
- Reg. 4(2)(e)
- Reg. 4(2)(g)
- Reg. 4(2)(b)
Parties
- Thomas Kutty
Holding
The Noticee, Thomas Kutty, violated regulations 4(1), 4(2)(a), (b), (e) and (g) of the PFUTP Regulations by engaging in synchronized trading with a group of entities in the scrip of ALL, aiding and abetting market manipulation, and a penalty of Rs.75,000 was imposed under section 15HA of the SEBI Act.
Full text
Page 2 of 13 Investments Ltd. (193), Pilot Credit Capital Ltd. (909), S.P.J. Stock Brokers Private Limited (646) and Shailesh M. Nissar (707) {hereinafter collectively referred to as “Group”} dealt in the scrip of ALL allegedly in violation of the provisions of various regulations made under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as “SEBI Act”).
Page 3 of 13 SEBI Act for the alleged violation specified in the said SCN. The same was returned undelivered. Consequently, SCN No. EAD-5/VSS/JR/120994/2008 dated March 19, 2008 was issued to the Noticee through SEBI, Northern Regional Office (hereinafter referred to as “NRO”). The SCN was duly received and acknowledged by the Noticee on April 2, 2008.
Page 4 of 13 c) If so, what would be the monetary penalty that can be imposed taking into consideration the factors mentioned in section 15J of SEBI Act?
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:VSS/AO-110/2009. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.