sebi:VKV/DL/AO-42/2016
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Adjudication proceedings disposed of as cannot be proceeded with
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 15I
- s. 15J
- s. 15C
- s. 446
- s. 391
Parties
- M/s Reinz Talbros Limited
Holding
The adjudication proceedings initiated against the Noticee vide SCN dated February 02, 2016 cannot be proceeded with and the matter is disposed of because the Noticee is under liquidation and no leave under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been obtained.
Full text
Adjudicating Order in respect of M/s Reinz Talbros Limited February 16, 2016 Page 2 of 5 upon such company to redress the investor complaint. It was observed that one (01) investor complaint(s) were pending against the Noticee as on July 20, 2012.
Adjudicating Order in respect of M/s Reinz Talbros Limited February 16, 2016 Page 3 of 5 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the undersigned is of the opinion that no prejudice would be caused to the Noticee in the given matter, if opportunity of hearing under Rule 4(3) of Adjudication Rules is not provided to it and I deem it appropriate to decide the matter on the basis of facts/materials available on record.
Adjudicating Order in respect of M/s Reinz Talbros Limited February 16, 2016 Page 4 of 5 "Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:VKV/DL/AO-42/2016. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.