sebi:SRP/JP/AO/258/2012
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Violation found; penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
Regulations
- Reg. 7
Parties
- Anagram Stockbroking Ltd
Holding
The Noticee violated clause A(2) of the Code of Conduct for Stock Brokers under Schedule II read with regulation 7 of the Brokers Regulations and is liable for monetary penalty under Section 15HB of the SEBI Act. A penalty of Rs. 50,000 was imposed on the Noticee.
Full text
Page 2 of 14 3. In view of the said observations/findings of the investigations, it has been alleged that the Noticee has failed to exercise due care, skill and diligence in the conduct of its business and has thereby violated the provisions of clause A (2) of the code of conduct for stock brokers specified under Schedule II read with regulation 7 of the SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub- brokers) Regulations, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Brokers Regulations’).
Page 3 of 14 7. The written and oral submissions made by the Noticee in respect of the allegations referred to in the SCN are mainly to the following effect:
Page 4 of 14 • Number of trades in the scrip of SJCL during the Investigation Period was 1,085 out of which 226 trades were done through the sub- brokers of the Noticee by its clients. Average price rise in SJCL on each of the trading day during the Investigation Period was 4.81% whereas, it was 4.33% for the trades executed through the sub-brokers of the Noticee.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:SRP/JP/AO/258/2012. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.