sebi:SD/AO/31/2009

SEBI · SEBI · 2008-08-13 · Sandeep Deore, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Penalty of Rs. 2,00,000 imposed under Section 15HB of the SEBI Act

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The Noticee violated Clause A(2) of the Code of Conduct under Regulation 7 of the Brokers Regulations by failing to exercise due skill, care and diligence in trading in the scrip of FTEL and is liable to monetary penalty under Section 15HB of the SEBI Act.

Full text

Page 2 of 10 manipulation of the scrip price of FTEL in a fraudulent manner. The activities of these entities facilitated the creation of artificial volumes and influenced the scrip price of FTEL in the securities market.

Page 3 of 10 penalty, as prescribed be not imposed under Section 15HB of SEBI Act for its violation of provisions of Clauses A(2) of the Code of Conduct for stock brokers as per Regulation 7 of the Brokers Regulations. It was also advised to the Noticee to reply within 14 days from the date of receipt of this notice alongwith the copies of the documents, if any, in support of contentions, failing which the matter shall be proceeded on the basis of the materials available on record.

Page 4 of 10 c.If, yes what should be the quantum of monetary penalty ? 8. Before proceeding I would like to refer the relevant alleged provisions of Brokers Regulations which inter alia states as under :

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:SD/AO/31/2009. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.