sebi:SD/AO/24/2009

SEBI · SEBI · 2007-11-12 · Sandeep Deore, Adjudicating Officer

Reviewed by Varun Matlani, Advocate — Securities Lawyer practicing in SAT and SEBI

Facts / Headnote

Alleged violation not established; matter disposed of without penalty

Provisions invoked

Regulations relied on

Parties

Holding

The allegation of violation of Regulation 4 (2) (a) & (e) of the PFUTP Regulations, 2003 by the Noticee is not established and the matter is disposed of without penalty.

Full text

Page 2 of 9 almost 12 months. It was alleged that a group of brokers and their clients had traded in such a way that it led to creation of artificial volume in the scrip with the purpose to launder money.

Page 3 of 9 submissions made by the Noticee in the said letter have been looked into while deciding the issues involved in the instant case in subsequent paragraphs.

Page 4 of 9 (e) any act or omission amounting to manipulation of the price of a security;” 8. It was observed by SEBI during the course of the said investigation that the Noticee had traded substantially in the scrip of RFSL on the CSE during the period under investigation through the broker M/s. S. Jhunjhunwala & Co. The details of buy and sell trades of the Noticee in RFSL during the said period, as observed from the Investigation Report pertaining to the said investigation (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IR’), are provided below.

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:SD/AO/24/2009. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.