sebi:QJA/SS/CFID/CFID-CORD/32404/2026-27
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Allegations of fraud and unfair trade practice not established; no directions under Section 11(4) and Section 11B(1) of the SEBI Act warranted
Provisions invoked
- s. 11B
- s. 11A
- s. 11
- s. 11(4)
- s. 15A
- s. 15
- s. 19
- s. 11(1)
- s. 12A
- s. 11(2)
- s. 15H
- s. 27
- s. 12
- s. 15I
- s. 15J
- s. 11C
- s. 15F
- s. 28A
- s. 23A
- s. 21
Regulations
- Reg. 4
- Reg. 2(c)
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 6
- Reg. 2(1)(c)
- Reg. 4(1)
- Reg. 17
- Reg. 4(2)
- Reg. 4(2)(f)
- Reg. 2
- Reg. 34
- Reg. 23
- Reg. 3(b)
- Reg. 2(1)
- Reg. 18
- Reg. 201
- Reg. 30
- Reg. 4(2)(e)
- Reg. 8(1)
- Reg. 4(2)(r)
Parties
- Noticee No. 1
- Noticee No. 2
- Noticee No. 3
- Noticee No. 4
- Noticee No. 5
- Noticee No. 6
- Noticee No. 7
- Noticee No. 8
- Noticee No. 9
- Noticee No. 10
- Noticee No. 11
Holding
The adjudicating authority held that the allegations of fraud and unfair trade practices against FRL and the Noticees were not established, and that the present case does not warrant directions under Section 11(4) and Section 11B(1) of the SEBI Act.
Full text
___________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of Future Retail Limited
___________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of Future Retail Limited
___________________________________________________________________________ Order in the matter of Future Retail Limited
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:QJA/SS/CFID/CFID-CORD/32404/2026-27. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.