sebi:QJA/GR/CFID/CFID-SEC3/30713/2024-25
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Provisions invoked
- s. 11
- s. 15A
- s. 15
- s. 11(1)
- s. 12A
- s. 15H
- s. 27
- s. 15J
- s. 11C
- s. 12
- s. 28A
- s. 11C(2)
- s. 27(1)
- s. 89
- s. 2(77)
- s. 184
- s. 2(76)
- s. 188
- s. 11B(2)
Regulations
- Reg. 4
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 2(1)(c)
- Reg. 5
- Reg. 200
- Reg. 3(a)
- Reg. 3(c)
- Reg. 23
- Reg. 4(1)(a)
- Reg. 48
- Reg. 2(1)
- Reg. 23(2)
- Reg. 23(4)
- Reg. 30(2)
- Reg. 17(8)
- Reg. 4(1)(c)
- Reg. 23(9)
- Reg. 33(2)(a)
- Reg. 34(3)
- Reg. 33(1)
Parties
- Rana Sugars Limited (Noticee No.1)
- Inder Pratap Singh Rana (Noticee No.2)
- Ranjit Singh Rana (Noticee No.3)
- Noticee No.4
- Noticee No.5
- Noticee No.6
- Noticee No.7
- Noticee No.8
- Noticee No.9
- Manoj Gupta (Noticee No.10)
- Noticee No.11
- Noticee No.12
- Noticee No.13
- Noticee No.14
- Noticee No.15
Holding
The order finds that Noticee No.1 to 7 violated Section 11C(2) and 11C(3) of the SEBI Act by failing to appear before the Investigating Authority and furnish information sought by summons, and rejects the Noticees' submissions that funds transferred to conduit entities were genuine business advances, finding them to be an afterthought disguising diversion of funds.
Full text
Order in the matter of Rana Sugars Limited Page 2 of 81 examine diversion of funds from RSL by the promoters and promoter related entities of RSL, consequent misstatements in the financial statements of RSL and whether the alleged diverted funds have been siphoned off by the promoters and promoter related entities of RSL resulting in violations of the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 ( “SEBI Act”), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003 ( “PFUTP Regulations”) and Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulation,2015 (“LODR Regulations”). Investigation period has been considered to be from financial year (FY) 2014-15 to FY 2020-21. However, wherever deemed necessary, references have been made to events/timeframes outside this period.
Order in the matter of Rana Sugars Limited Page 3 of 81 Table 1 Name of the entity that received funds from RSL Amount (Rs.) received from RSL (2014- 2021) Name of entity to which
Order in the matter of Rana Sugars Limited Page 4 of 81 Name of the entity that received funds from RSL Amount (Rs.) received from RSL (2014- 2021) Name of entity to which
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:QJA/GR/CFID/CFID-SEC3/30713/2024-25. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.