sebi:PKK/AO/130-131/2011

SEBI · SEBI · 2011-02-09 · P K Kuriachen, Adjudicating Officer

Reviewed by Varun Matlani, Advocate — Securities Lawyer practicing in SAT and SEBI

Facts / Headnote

Penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 each imposed on two Noticees for violation of Regulation 7(1A)

Provisions invoked

Regulations relied on

Parties

Holding

The Noticees violated Regulation 7(1A) of the SAST Regulations for acquisitions for years ended March 2002, March 2003 and March 2004 and are liable for monetary penalty under Section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act, with Rs. 1,00,000 imposed on each Noticee.

Full text

Page 2 of 10 2. SEBI has therefore initiated adjudication proceedings under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘SEBI Act’) against the Noticees to inquire into and adjudge the alleged violations of the provisions of Regulation 7 (1A) of the SAST Regulations.

Page 3 of 10 6. The due dates for making disclosure as required under Regulation 7 (1A) of the SAST Regulations in respect of the abovementioned acquisitions were April 02, 1998; April 02, 2000; April 02, 2001, April 02, 2002; April 02, 2003 and April 02, 2004 respectively whereas the same was made on October 20, 2006. The Noticees are therefore alleged to have violated Regulation 7 (1A) of the SAST Regulations.

Page 4 of 10 Consideration of Issues, Evidence and Findings 9. The issues that arise for consideration in the present case are as follows:

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:PKK/AO/130-131/2011. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.