sebi:PKK/AO/112/2010
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Noticee found guilty; monetary penalty imposed
Provisions invoked
- s. 11
- s. 15A
- s. 15
- s. 15I
- s. 15J
- s. 11C
- s. 12
Parties
- Shri Sandeep Kadam
Holding
The Noticee, Shri Sandeep Kadam, was held liable for violating Sections 11C(2) read with 11C(5) of the SEBI Act by failing to comply with the summons issued by the Investigating Authority, and a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 was imposed under Section 15A(a) of the SEBI Act.
Full text
Page 2 of 9 MCL in a fraudulent manner which resulted in the manipulation of the price of MCL. Their trading contributed in creation of artificial volume and influenced unrealistic price increase.
Page 3 of 9 Department of SEBI, the undersigned was appointed, vide Order dated August 17, 2010, as the AO in the instant matter.
Page 4 of 9 Consideration of Issues, Evidence and Findings 7. I have carefully perused the charges made against the Noticee as mentioned in the SCN and the documents available on record. In the instant matter the following issues arise for consideration and determination: a. Whether the Noticee had violated the provisions of the Section 11C (2) & 11C (5) of the SEBI Act for non- compliance of summons issued by the IA, SEBI? b. If whether the Noticee is liable for monetary penalty prescribed under Section 15A (a) of the SEBI Act for the aforesaid violation? c. If, yes what should be the quantum of monetary
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:PKK/AO/112/2010. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.