sebi:PKB/AO-88/2009
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Found guilty; penalty imposed
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 7
- Reg. 3
Parties
- Ahilya Commercial Pvt. Ltd.
Holding
The Noticee was found guilty of violating Regulations 3, 4(1), 4(2)(a),(b),(e),(g) and (o) of the PFUTP Regulations and Clauses A(1),(2),(3),(4) and B(4)(a) of the Code of Conduct for Stock Brokers. A total monetary penalty of Rs. 2,00,000 was imposed under sections 15HA and 15HB of the Act.
Full text
Adjudication Order in respect of Ahilya Commercial Pvt. Ltd. in the matter of Brahmanand HimgharLtd. Page 2 of 17 July 24, 2009 initiated in respect of Ahilya Commercial Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Noticee”).
Adjudication Order in respect of Ahilya Commercial Pvt. Ltd. in the matter of Brahmanand HimgharLtd. Page 3 of 17 July 24, 2009 managed to manipulate the price as well as create an artificial volume in the scrip of the Company.
Adjudication Order in respect of Ahilya Commercial Pvt. Ltd. in the matter of Brahmanand HimgharLtd. Page 4 of 17 July 24, 2009 We deny that there has been any involvement of our artificially inflating the price or creating false volumes through continuous self deals as alleged or otherwise or at all. We have conducted ourselves diligently and have carried our instructions received from our clients, albeit after due observance and compliance of the applicable provisions, regulations, rules and laws of land. Trades in the scrip were on the basis of instructions received from clients and after due compliance of the applicable provisions relatable to a stock broker. We have no other relationship with any of our clients other than a “Client –Broker Relationship”, on which basis, we earn our brokerage. We have not violated any of the established and laid down norms applicable to a Stock Broking and maintained our records correctly and diligently and also conducted ourselves fairly. So whatever the allegations made on us is unholy nexus is incorrect and denied and disputed. We repeat that we have only acted in pursuance of instructions received by us from our clients and were personally not involved in any alleged manipulation of price or volume. It is, further, stated that in respect of trading we have charged and received brokerage as entitled under law and there is no questions of any unjust enrichment in any from or manner whatsoever. Sir, we always abide the code of conduct in
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:PKB/AO-88/2009. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.