sebi:PKB/AO-44/2009
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Violation established; penalty imposed
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 7
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 4
- Reg. 4(2)
- Reg. 2
- Reg. 4(2)(a)
- Reg. 4(2)(b)
Parties
- Shri N. M. Lohia
Holding
The noticee violated Regulations 3, 4(1), 4(2)(a), (b), (e), (g), (n) and (o) of PFUTP Regulations, 2003 and Clauses A(1)-(4) and B(4)(a) of the Stock Brokers Code of Conduct. A total penalty of Rs. 6,00,000 was imposed under Sections 15HA and 15HB of the SEBI Act.
Full text
Adjudication Order In Respect of Shri N.M. Lohia In The Matter of Richfield Financial Services Ltd. Page 2 of 18 5/14/2009 poor financial performance of RFSL and as such did not justify the steep rise in share prices which the company witnessed during the investigation period.
Adjudication Order In Respect of Shri N.M. Lohia In The Matter of Richfield Financial Services Ltd. Page 3 of 18 5/14/2009 course of investigation. His concentration position at the Exchange is given below:
Adjudication Order In Respect of Shri N.M. Lohia In The Matter of Richfield Financial Services Ltd. Page 4 of 18 5/14/2009 observed from the CSE trade and order log that a huge volume of trades executed by the noticee as cross deals were self trades.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:PKB/AO-44/2009. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.