sebi:PKB/AO-117/2009
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Noticee found guilty and penalty of Rs. 3,00,000 imposed
Provisions invoked
- s. 11
- s. 15
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
- s. 15A
- s. 12
Regulations
- Reg. 7
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 6
- Reg. 8
- Reg. 8(1)
- Reg. 4(2)(o)
Parties
- M/s. Vaydoot Commercial Pvt. Ltd.
Holding
M/s. Vaydoot Commercial (P) Ltd. violated Regulations 3, 4(1), 4(2)(a), (b), (e) and (g) and Regulation 8(1) read with Sections 11C(2) and (3), and was held liable under Sections 15HA and 15A(a) for Rs. 3,00,000 total penalty. It was held not guilty of violating Regulation 4(2)(o) as it is a client and not an intermediary.
Full text
Adjudication Order in respect of M/s. Vaydoot Commercial Pvt. Ltd. in the matter of M/s. Twenty First Century (India) Ltd. Page 2 of 19 September 23, 2009 Pvt. Ltd. had traded 14635447 shares of the Company which formed 74.4% of the total market volume (19674448 shares) during the Investigation Period.
Adjudication Order in respect of M/s. Vaydoot Commercial Pvt. Ltd. in the matter of M/s. Twenty First Century (India) Ltd. Page 3 of 19 September 23, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as “Adjudication Rules”), calling upon the Noticee to show cause why inquiry should not be held against the Noticee under Rule 4(3) of the Adjudication Rules for the alleged violations.
Adjudication Order in respect of M/s. Vaydoot Commercial Pvt. Ltd. in the matter of M/s. Twenty First Century (India) Ltd. Page 4 of 19 September 23, 2009 “As there were thousands of broker before “Ketan Parekh’s” case and thereafter no investor has faith in Calcutta Stock Exchange Association, so the trade at CSEA was almost stop. After that only few brokers were in trade so volume will be definitely increase and matched with single or few broker.” “All the transactions were executed through registered broker and as per market rate. It means there cannot be any sort of connivance or unfair trade practice.” “All transactions were made with respective codes as provided by broker and as per rate reflected in C-Star (Terminal of CSEA). We neither create any artificial price for any one nor suggest any rate to them. Our work is only to transact as an investor to make some profit.” “All the transaction for purchase or sale of securities was made in normal course of business and with Stock Exchange only.” “Some notice were not replied by us in past is due to our unawareness. We were in opinion that there is no default made by us and we have made only normal business transactions as per prescribed norm. So there is nothing to be replied and this is the only mistake of misconception.” “In view of the facts as above it is apparent that the alleged violation is not intentional. There is neither we make any undue advantage nor any loss happened to any one due to our transaction. We are
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:PKB/AO-117/2009. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.