sebi:PG/TT/AO-04-05/2012
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Penalty of Rs.10,00,000 each imposed on Noticee-1 and Noticee-2
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 15G
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 3(i)
- Reg. 2
- Reg. 2(c)
- Reg. 2(h)
Parties
- Harish K. Vaid
- Harish K. Vaid-HUF
Holding
The Adjudicating Officer held that Harish K. Vaid violated regulations 3(ii) and 4 of the PIT Regulations and Harish K. Vaid-HUF violated regulations 3(i), 3(ii) and 4 of the PIT Regulations, imposing a penalty of Rs.10,00,000 on each under section 15G of the SEBI Act.
Full text
____________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication order in respect of Harish K. Vaid and Harish K. Vaid-HUF in the matter of Jaiprakash Associates Ltd.
____________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication order in respect of Harish K. Vaid and Harish K. Vaid-HUF in the matter of Jaiprakash Associates Ltd.
____________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication order in respect of Harish K. Vaid and Harish K. Vaid-HUF in the matter of Jaiprakash Associates Ltd.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:PG/TT/AO-04-05/2012. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.