sebi:PG/AO-58/2010
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Penalty imposed
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 2
- Reg. 3(a)
Parties
- Ratnaram B Rabari
Holding
The Noticee violated regulation 3(a), (b), (c) and (d) of the PFUTP Regulations by acting as a conduit and aiding promoters/related entities in offloading shares of Alka India Ltd, and a penalty of Rs.1,50,000 under section 15HA of the SEBI Act was imposed.
Full text
Page 2 of 19 “ASE”), Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange, Rajkot (hereinafter referred to as “SKSE”) and Jaipur stock Exchange (hereinafter referred to as “JSE”). It was observed that no transaction in the said scrip was reported at ASE, SKSE and JSE during the investigation period. Hence, for the purpose of investigation the trades done at BSE were considered.
Page 3 of 19 Broking (P) Limited) broker-BSE, also assisted the promoter/related entities/other entities to offload shares by creating artificial demand in the scrip by placing large buy orders at very low prices and later canceling them.
Page 4 of 19 8. The findings of the investigation led to the allegation that the Noticee had violated regulation 3 (a), (b), (c) & (d) of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Markets) Regulations, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “PFUTP Regulations”) and consequently, liable for monetary
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:PG/AO-58/2010. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.