sebi:PB/AO-14/2010
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 7
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 4(1)
- Reg. 4(a)
- Reg. 2
- Reg. 4(2)(a)
- Reg. 4(2)(g)
- Reg. 4(2)(b)
- Reg. 4(2)(n)
Parties
- Pramod Kumar Jain (Broker/PKJ/Noticee)
Holding
The Noticee (Pramod Kumar Jain) was found to have violated the PFUTP Regulations and the Code of Conduct for Stock Brokers by executing circular, reversal and synchronized transactions in the scrip of KRBL on behalf of its clients, creating artificial volume and misleading appearance of trading. The Noticee was held liable for monetary penalty under sections 15HA and 15HB of the SEBI Act.
Full text
Page 2 of 35 3. The entities found to have been involved in the alleged manipulation and against whom adjudication proceedings were initiated are divided into three groups on the basis of their trading vis-à-vis relationship as under:-
Page 3 of 35 Madhusudan Nair 10. Bharati Thakkar Sayyed Mustafa, Prem Prakash Thanvi 11. Uttam Financial Services Own Account 12. Pilot Credit Capital Ltd. Deepak Vyas
Page 4 of 35 of the Rules to show cause as to why an inquiry should not be held and penalty be not imposed under sections 15HA and 15 HB of SEBI Act for the alleged violation specified in the said SCN.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:PB/AO-14/2010. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.