sebi:Order/SM/SM/2025-26/31941
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Provisions invoked
- s. 11B
- s. 11
- s. 15
- s. 19
- s. 12A
- s. 15H
- s. 15I
- s. 15J
- s. 15F
- s. 28A
- s. 15C
- s. 15E
Regulations
- Reg. 7
- Reg. 4
- Reg. 11
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 13
- Reg. 12
- Reg. 9
- Reg. 4(2)
- Reg. 200
- Reg. 2
- Reg. 3(a)
- Reg. 2(1)
- Reg. 24
- Reg. 19
- Reg. 20
- Reg. 13(1)
- Reg. 201
- Reg. 20(1)
- Reg. 4(2)(k)
- Reg. 25(3)
Parties
- Prerna Sharma
Holding
The Noticee, Prerna Sharma (Research Analyst), was held to have violated Regulation 19 of the RA Regulations by omitting required disclosures, Regulation 13(iii) of the RA Regulations by not using the term 'research analyst' in all correspondences, Regulation 13(1) of the Intermediaries Regulations for delayed grievance redressal, and the PFUTP Regulations for using misleading YouTube video captions. The adjudication proceedings were ongoing with issues framed on liability and quantum of penalty.
Full text
__________________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Proceedings in the matter of Prerna Sharma (Research Anaylst). Page 2 of 39
__________________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Proceedings in the matter of Prerna Sharma (Research Anaylst). Page 3 of 39
__________________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Proceedings in the matter of Prerna Sharma (Research Anaylst). Page 4 of 39
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/SM/SM/2025-26/31941. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.