sebi:Order/SM/DD/2022-23/18446

SEBI · SEBI · 2021-03-02 · Soma Majumder, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 imposed on Noticee

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

Noticee O Boopathi violated Regulation 7(2)(a) of PIT Regulations on five occasions by failing to disclose trades exceeding Rs. 10 lakh, and a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 under Section 15A(b) of SEBI Act was imposed.

Full text

Adjudication Order in respect of O Boopathi in the matter of Titan Company Ltd. Page 2 of 9 ‘SEBI Act’) for alleged violation of Regulation 7(2)(a) of PIT Regulations by Noticee.

Adjudication Order in respect of O Boopathi in the matter of Titan Company Ltd. Page 3 of 9 excess of the limit specified in Regulation 7(2)(a) of PIT Regulations, Noticee was required to make disclosure in terms of the aforesaid regulation. In this regard, in reply to a query by SEBI, TCL vide email dated October 28, 2020, confirmed that it had not received any disclosures from Noticee.

Adjudication Order in respect of O Boopathi in the matter of Titan Company Ltd. Page 4 of 9 CONSIDERATION OF ISSUES, EVIDENCE AND FINDINGS

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/SM/DD/2022-23/18446. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.