sebi:Order/SM/AE/2022-23/16375-16387
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
No violation established; no penalty imposed
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 11(1)
- s. 11B
- s. 12A
- s. 12
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 7
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 6
- Reg. 4(1)
- Reg. 9
Holding
The Adjudicating Officer held that Noticees 1 to 12 did not violate section 12A(a), (b) and (c) of SEBI Act read with PFUTP Regulations and Noticee 13 did not violate the said provisions read with the Stock Brokers Regulations, and no penalty was warranted.
Full text
___________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in the matter of Garware Polyster Limited Page 2 of 48
___________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in the matter of Garware Polyster Limited Page 3 of 48
___________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in the matter of Garware Polyster Limited Page 4 of 48
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/SM/AE/2022-23/16375-16387. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.