sebi:Order/PM/SM/2022-23/17319

SEBI · SEBI · 2020-12-07 · Prasanta Mahapatra, Adjudicating Officer

Reviewed by Varun Matlani, Advocate — Securities Lawyer practicing in SAT and SEBI

Facts / Headnote

Violation established; penalty of Rs 1,00,000 imposed

Provisions invoked

Regulations relied on

Parties

Holding

The Noticee violated regulation 7(2)(a) of the PIT Regulations by failing to disclose trades exceeding Rs 10,00,000 in a calendar quarter within two trading days, and a monetary penalty of Rs 1,00,000 was imposed under section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act.

Full text

Adjudication Order in respect of Vinay Kumar Sutrave, Page 2 of 17 In the matter of Mindtree Ltd. transactions aggregating to a traded value in excess of Rs 10,00,000 over a calendar quarter.

Adjudication Order in respect of Vinay Kumar Sutrave, Page 3 of 17 In the matter of Mindtree Ltd. 7. The allegations levelled against the Noticee in the SCN are summarized below as follows:

Adjudication Order in respect of Vinay Kumar Sutrave, Page 4 of 17 In the matter of Mindtree Ltd. (vi) Given the above, it was alleged that the Noticee had violated regulation 7(2)(a) of the PIT Regulations. The alleged violation, if established, makes the Noticee liable for monetary penalty under section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act.

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/PM/SM/2022-23/17319. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.