sebi:Order/PM/PA/2021-22/15695
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Violation of regulation 7(2)(a) of the PIT Regulations established; penalty of Rs 1,00,000 imposed under section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act.
Provisions invoked
- s. 15A
- s. 15
- s. 19
- s. 11B
- s. 11
- s. 15J
- s. 15F
Regulations
- Reg. 6(2)
- Reg. 7(2)(a)
Parties
- Samir Mankar
Holding
The Noticee, an employee of Mindtree Ltd., violated regulation 7(2)(a) of the PIT Regulations by failing to disclose transactions exceeding Rs 10,00,000 in a calendar quarter within two trading days, and a penalty of Rs 1,00,000 was imposed under section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act.
Full text
Adjudication order in respect of Samir Mankar, Page 2 of 15 In the matter of Mindtree Ltd. 3. The investigation revealed that Samir Mankar (hereinafter referred to as the “Noticee”) was an employee of the Company and had transacted in the Company’s scrip during the Investigation Period. It was further observed that the Noticee had done transactions aggregating to a traded value in excess of Rs 10,00,000 over a calendar quarter.
Adjudication order in respect of Samir Mankar, Page 3 of 15 In the matter of Mindtree Ltd. C. SHOW CAUSE NOTICE, REPLY AND HEARING
Adjudication order in respect of Samir Mankar, Page 4 of 15 In the matter of Mindtree Ltd. observed that the Noticee had executed transactions aggregating to a traded value in excess of Rs 10,00,000 in a calendar quarter i.e., from January 01, 2019 till March 31, 2019.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/PM/PA/2021-22/15695. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.