sebi:Order/PM/PA/2021-22/15271
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Violation of regulation 7(2)(a) of the PIT Regulations established; penalty of Rs 1,00,000 imposed under section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act
Provisions invoked
- s. 15A
- s. 15
- s. 19
- s. 11B
- s. 11
- s. 15J
- s. 15F
Regulations
- Reg. 6(2)
- Reg. 7(2)(a)
Parties
- Bankri Rudraswamy Prasanna Kumar
Holding
The Noticee, an employee of Mindtree Ltd., violated regulation 7(2)(a) of the PIT Regulations by failing to disclose trades aggregating to Rs 40,871,580 in the calendar quarter January 01, 2019 to March 31, 2019 within two trading days, and a penalty of Rs 1,00,000 was imposed under section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act.
Full text
Adjudication order in respect of Bankri Rudraswamy Prasanna Kumar Page 2 of 14 In the matter of Mindtree Ltd. and had transacted in the Company’s scrip on multiple occasions, including during the Investigation Period. It was further observed that the Noticee had done transactions aggregating to a traded value in excess of Rs 10,00,000 over the calendar quarter from January 01, 2019 to March 31, 2019.
Adjudication order in respect of Bankri Rudraswamy Prasanna Kumar Page 3 of 14 In the matter of Mindtree Ltd. the Noticee under rule 4 of the SEBI Adjudication Rules to show cause as to why an inquiry should not be held against him in terms of rule 4 of the SEBI Adjudication Rules and penalty should not be imposed under section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act for the violation alleged to have been committed by him. I note that the SCN was not delivered at the address of the Noticee. Thereafter, the SCN was served vide emails sent on October 06, 2021. I note that the said emails were delivered at the following email address of the Noticee “prasannabr.info@gmail.com”. In the SCN, the Noticee was asked to indicate whether he would prefer a personal hearing before the adjudicating officer in the matter.
Adjudication order in respect of Bankri Rudraswamy Prasanna Kumar Page 4 of 14 In the matter of Mindtree Ltd. (iv) In terms of the provisions of regulation 7(2)(a) of the PIT Regulations, as it existed at the time the Noticee committed the alleged violation, promoters, employees and directors of every company were required to disclose to the company the number of securities acquired or disposed of, within two trading days of such transaction, if the value of the securities traded, whether in one transaction or a series of transactions over any calendar quarter, aggregated to a traded value in excess of Rs 10,00,000.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/PM/PA/2021-22/15271. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.