sebi:Order/MC/VS/2021-22/13992-13997
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
No penalty imposed; charges not established due to inability to determine date of creation of UPSI
Provisions invoked
- s. 11B
- s. 15
- s. 12A
- s. 15H
- s. 15G
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 199
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 4
- Reg. 2
- Reg. 4(1)
- Reg. 201
- Reg. 9
- Reg. 2(1)(d)
- Reg. 2(1)(d)(i)
- Reg. 9(1)
- Reg. 30
- Reg. 2(1)
- Reg. 3(1)
- Reg. 2(1)(g)(i)
Parties
- Suven Life Sciences Limited (Noticee 1)
- Jasti Family Trust (Noticee 2)
- Venkateshwarlu Jasti (Noticee 3)
- Venkata Vajramma Uppalapati (Noticee 4)
- Pardhasaradhi Uppalapati (Noticee 5)
- Lakshmana Rao Veeramachaneni (Noticee 6)
Holding
The Adjudicating Officer held that the charges against all Noticees could not be established because the date of creation of the alleged UPSI (pertaining to clinical trial progress) was not available on record, making it impossible to determine whether trades occurred during the UPSI period or when Noticee 1 should have closed its trading window. No penalty was imposed on any Noticee.
Full text
Adjudication Order in respect of Suven Life Sciences Limited and 5 others in the matter of Suven Life Sciences Limited Page 2 of 45
Adjudication Order in respect of Suven Life Sciences Limited and 5 others in the matter of Suven Life Sciences Limited Page 3 of 45
Adjudication Order in respect of Suven Life Sciences Limited and 5 others in the matter of Suven Life Sciences Limited Page 4 of 45
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/MC/VS/2021-22/13992-13997. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.