sebi:Order/MC/VS/2020-21/10597-10605
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Disposed of - allegations not established, no penalty imposed
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 12A
- s. 12
- s. 15H
Regulations
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 3(a)
Parties
- Chetankumar Shashikant Shah (Noticee 1)
- Deepak Kumar Bhawsingka (Noticee 2)
- Mitesh Shashikant Shah (Noticee 3)
- Ramesh Mardia HUF (Noticee 4)
- Vishwadeep Agarwal (Noticee 5)
- Vishal Agarwal (Noticee 6)
- Vinita Agarwal (Noticee 7)
- Nikunjben Mehulbhai Maniar (Noticee 8)
- Shah Hitesh Chinubhai HUF (Noticee 9)
Holding
The adjudication proceedings against all nine Noticees were disposed of, with the allegations that they violated Section 12A(a), (b), (c) of the SEBI Act read with Regulations 3(a)-(d) and 4(1), 4(2)(a), (e) of the PFUTP Regulations by creating misleading appearance of trading and causing price fall in the scrip of Pincon Lifestyle Ltd not being established.
Full text
Adjudication Order in respect of Chetankumar Shashikant Shah and 8 others in the matter of Pincon Lifestyle Ltd. Page 2 of 32
Adjudication Order in respect of Chetankumar Shashikant Shah and 8 others in the matter of Pincon Lifestyle Ltd. Page 3 of 32
Adjudication Order in respect of Chetankumar Shashikant Shah and 8 others in the matter of Pincon Lifestyle Ltd. Page 4 of 32
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/MC/VS/2020-21/10597-10605. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.