sebi:Order/KS/AE/2020-21/10100

SEBI · SEBI · 2007-12-11 · K Saravanan, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Adjudication proceedings disposed of without going into the merits of the case

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The adjudication proceedings initiated against the Noticee (Honor Finance Ltd.) vide SCN dated June 07, 2019 cannot be proceeded with because the Noticee had been dissolved under BVI law prior to the appointment of the current Adjudicating Officer.

Full text

Adjudication order in respect of Honor Finance Ltd. in the matter of GDR Issue of Cals Refineries Ltd. Page 2 of 6 dated December 11, 2007 for the said purpose. Further, Cals had pledged the entire GDR proceeds by way of an Account Charge Agreement dated December 11, 2007 as a surety towards the loan availed by the Noticee for the purpose of subscribing its GDR issue. It was also observed that the Noticee had also repaid part of the loan using money transferred by Cals, routed via connected entities of Cals. Thus, the investigation by SEBI revealed that entire GDRs were issued in a fraudulent manner and the Noticee was a party to the fraud. In view of the same, it was alleged that the Noticee had violated the provisions of Section 12A (a), (b), and (c) of SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulation 3(b),(c),(d), 4(2)(c), 4(2)(f), 4(2)(k) and 4(2)(r) of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘PFUTP Regulations’). Accordingly, adjudication proceedings was initiated against the Noticee under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act, 1992 for the aforesaid alleged violations.

Adjudication order in respect of Honor Finance Ltd. in the matter of GDR Issue of Cals Refineries Ltd. Page 3 of 6 under Rule 4(1) of the Adjudication Rules to show cause as to why an inquiry should not be initiated and penalty be not imposed under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act, 1992 for the alleged violation specified in the SCN. It was alleged in the SCN that Noticee has violated Section 12A(a), (b) and (c) of SEBI Act, read with Regulations 3(b), (c), (d), 4(2)(c), (f), (k)& (r) of PFUTP Regulations.

Adjudication order in respect of Honor Finance Ltd. in the matter of GDR Issue of Cals Refineries Ltd. Page 4 of 6 request for service of the notice on the Noticee, and stated inter alia that the Noticee company was struck off the BVI Register of Companies on April 30, 2011 following non-payment of its annual registration fees and was dissolved seven years later on May 01, 2018 in accordance with BVI laws. A copy of the Company Search Report of the Noticee was also enclosed in this regard. I also note that the BVI FSC, vide letter dated November 12, 2020, has forwarded copy of the abovementioned letter dated September 04, 2020 to the Noticee’s Registered Agent viz. TRIDENT TRUST COMPANY (B.V.I) LIMITED with instructions to deliver the same by email to the email addresses of the directors of the Noticee. Confirmation regarding the service of the same by email on the directors of the Noticee was communicated by TRIDENT TRUST COMPANY (B.V.I) LIMITED to BVI Financial Services Commission vide letter dated November 26, 2020.

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/KS/AE/2020-21/10100. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.