sebi:Order/JS/CM/2019-20/3782
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Noticee held liable for violating Regulations 3(a), 4(1) and 4(2)(a) of PFUTP Regulations, 2003; monetary penalty imposed under Section 15HA of SEBI Act
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 19
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
- s. 15F
- s. 15I(1)
Regulations
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 2(1)(c)
- Reg. 200
- Reg. 3(a)
- Reg. 4(2)(a)
- Reg. 2(1)
Parties
- Dippy Investments Pvt Ltd
Holding
The Noticee was found to have violated Regulations 3(a), 4(1) and 4(2)(a) of the PFUTP Regulations, 2003 by executing 146 non-genuine reversal trades in 69 illiquid stock option contracts at BSE, creating artificial volume of 4,232,750 units. A monetary penalty was imposed under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act.
Full text
Adjudication Order in respect of Dippy Investments Pvt Ltd in the matter of dealing in illiquid Stock Options at BSE ||Page 2 of 17
Adjudication Order in respect of Dippy Investments Pvt Ltd in the matter of dealing in illiquid Stock Options at BSE ||Page 3 of 17
Adjudication Order in respect of Dippy Investments Pvt Ltd in the matter of dealing in illiquid Stock Options at BSE ||Page 4 of 17
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/JS/CM/2019-20/3782. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.