sebi:Order/GR/RR/2020-21/10287-10289
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Violations established; monetary penalty imposed under Section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act, 1992
Provisions invoked
- s. 15A
- s. 15
- s. 15J
- s. 28A
Regulations
- Reg. 13
- Reg. 13(3)
- Reg. 13(4)
- Reg. 31
- Reg. 29(2)
- Reg. 12
- Reg. 31(1)
- Reg. 31(2)
- Reg. 2(q)(2)
- Reg. 12(2)
Parties
- Kiran Kulkarni
- Pankaj Kumar
- Veena Pankaj Kumar
Holding
The Adjudicating Officer held that Kiran Kulkarni (Noticee 1) and Pankaj Kumar (Noticee 2) violated Regulations 31(1), 31(2) and 29(2) of SAST Regulations, 2011 and Regulations 13(3), 13(4) and 13(4A) of PIT Regulations, 1992 read with Regulation 12(2) of PIT Regulations, 2015, and that Veena Pankaj Kumar (Noticee 3) violated Regulation 13(4A) of PIT Regulations, 1992 read with Regulation 12(2) and Regulation 29(2) of SAST, rendering them liable to penalty under Section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act, 1992.
Full text
Adjudication Order against Kiran Kulkarni, Pankaj Kumar and Veena Pankaj Kumar in the matter of M/s Geodesic Limited Page 2 | 31
Adjudication Order against Kiran Kulkarni, Pankaj Kumar and Veena Pankaj Kumar in the matter of M/s Geodesic Limited Page 3 | 31
Adjudication Order against Kiran Kulkarni, Pankaj Kumar and Veena Pankaj Kumar in the matter of M/s Geodesic Limited Page 4 | 31
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/GR/RR/2020-21/10287-10289. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.